Climate and cleantech investors
Climate investing spans software with near-zero marginal cost and hardware with long capital cycles, and conflating the two is the most common reason a good climate pitch gets no reply.
How to approach this segment
Capital intensity determines your investor set more than sector language does. A climate SaaS company should be pitching software investors who happen to like climate; a hardware company needs funds explicitly structured for longer horizons and follow-on scale. Approaching the wrong half wastes both parties.
Quantify the abatement claim or omit it. Vague impact framing invites scepticism in this segment specifically, because investors here have seen the claim overstated often enough to discount it by default.
What else these investors fund
Focus areas most often listed alongside ClimateTech & CleanTech by investors in this segment. Useful for judging whether an adjacent framing of your company would widen or narrow your list.
- Healthcare 132
- SaaS 131
- Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning (AI/ML) 130
- Software 122
- FinTech 118
- Big Data & Analytics 115
- E-Commerce 92
- Information Technology 89
Where they are based
- New York 48
- San Francisco 38
- Menlo Park 12
- Los Angeles 11
- Boston 10
- Palo Alto 9
See which investors these are
Individual investor records — firm, focus and each firm's own contact route — are not published on this page. Upload your deck and SendVC matches you against 5,000+ verified contacts — plus additional investors its AI finds and validates across the web for your specific startup, so the database is the floor of reach rather than the ceiling — then writes a personalized email per investor.