Researching investors yourself vs using SendVC

Researching investors yourself costs no money and gives you complete control and a real education in your own market; SendVC trades some of that control for speed, matching your deck against 5,000+ verified contacts and drafting a personalized email per investor for a flat monthly fee.

Every competitor figure on this page was read from that vendor's own website on the date listed under sources. Where a vendor's page could not be loaded, no figure is quoted at all. Vendor pricing changes — check the linked page before you budget.

SendVC vs Doing it yourself at a glance

Feature and pricing comparison between SendVC and Doing it yourself
	SendVC	Doing it yourself
Cash cost	From $19/month, flat. No commission or success fee.	Nothing. Your time is the entire cost.
Time before the first email goes out	Upload a deck; matching and drafting happen for you.	However long it takes you to research and write. This is the part founders underestimate.
Who writes the email	AI drafts one per investor, referencing their focus and portfolio.	You do, with full control over every word.
Contact data	5,000+ verified contacts, extended by AI discovery when the database is thin for your company.	Whatever you can find and verify yourself.
What you learn	You see who matched and why, but you did not do the reading.	A real education in who funds what — which compounds into this raise and the next one.
Scales to	10, 50 or 150 investor contacts a month depending on plan.	Realistically a few dozen before the quality of each email starts to slip.

What Doing it yourself actually is

Doing it yourself means assembling the list by hand: reading fund websites and portfolio pages to work out who actually invests at your stage in your sector, finding the right partner rather than the generic inbox, tracking it all in a spreadsheet, and writing each email individually.

It is how most raises have always been run, and it is free in the only sense that matters to a pre-revenue founder: it costs no cash. What it costs is calendar time, and it is front-loaded — the research happens before a single email goes out.

When doing it yourself is the right call

Your target list is genuinely small. If fifteen funds are the right fifteen, the overhead of any tool exceeds the work it saves. Research those fifteen properly and write fifteen real emails.
You are still working out your own positioning. Reading fifty fund theses is one of the fastest ways to learn how your market is described by the people funding it, and outsourcing that skips a lesson worth having.
You have a network. Warm introductions outperform cold outreach, consistently and by a wide margin. If you can reach investors through people who know you, do that first — no tool changes that ordering.
You want every word under your control. Nothing you send is drafted by anything but you, and for some founders that is non-negotiable.

When SendVC makes more sense

The research is the bottleneck, not the writing. Founders routinely spend the opening weeks of a raise building a spreadsheet instead of talking to investors, and that time is not recoverable.
You need reach beyond your network. Cold outreach is strictly worse than a warm intro, but it is strictly better than not reaching anyone — and most first-time founders do not have the network yet.
Contact data goes stale faster than you can maintain it. Partners move firms, funds change thesis, and a list assembled three months ago is already decaying.
You want the personalization without the hours. Writing a genuinely specific email per investor is what works and is exactly what does not scale by hand past a few dozen.

Questions founders ask

Is SendVC better than researching investors myself?

Not universally. Doing it yourself gives you complete control and teaches you your own market, and for a short, well-chosen list it is the better option. SendVC is the better option when the research is eating weeks you would rather spend talking to investors, or when you need to reach further than your own network reaches.

Can I do both?

Yes, and most founders should. Warm introductions and hand-written emails to your top handful of target funds, with automated outreach covering the much larger set of relevant investors you would otherwise never get to. The two are not in competition.

Does SendVC guarantee replies?

No. Cold outreach reply rates are low regardless of who sends them or how they are written, and anyone quoting you a figure is guessing. What SendVC changes is how many relevant investors receive a relevant message, and how much of your calendar that costs.

Sources and dates checked

SendVC pricing — checked 2026-08-18
Derived in code from PRICING_TIERS in types/index.ts.
SendVC investor database — aggregate statistics — checked 2026-08-18

See what SendVC matches you to

Upload your pitch deck and SendVC reads it, matches you against 5,000+ verified investor contacts, and writes a personalized email per investor. Flat monthly subscription — no commission, no success fee, no equity. Individual investor records are not published on this site.

Match my deck See pricing Inside the database

Researching investors yourself vs using SendVC

SendVC vs Doing it yourself at a glance

Feature and pricing comparison between SendVC and Doing it yourself
	SendVC	Doing it yourself
Cash cost	From $19/month, flat. No commission or success fee.	Nothing. Your time is the entire cost.
Time before the first email goes out	Upload a deck; matching and drafting happen for you.	However long it takes you to research and write. This is the part founders underestimate.
Who writes the email	AI drafts one per investor, referencing their focus and portfolio.	You do, with full control over every word.
Contact data	5,000+ verified contacts, extended by AI discovery when the database is thin for your company.	Whatever you can find and verify yourself.
What you learn	You see who matched and why, but you did not do the reading.	A real education in who funds what — which compounds into this raise and the next one.
Scales to	10, 50 or 150 investor contacts a month depending on plan.	Realistically a few dozen before the quality of each email starts to slip.

What Doing it yourself actually is

When doing it yourself is the right call

Your target list is genuinely small. If fifteen funds are the right fifteen, the overhead of any tool exceeds the work it saves. Research those fifteen properly and write fifteen real emails.

You are still working out your own positioning. Reading fifty fund theses is one of the fastest ways to learn how your market is described by the people funding it, and outsourcing that skips a lesson worth having.

You have a network. Warm introductions outperform cold outreach, consistently and by a wide margin. If you can reach investors through people who know you, do that first — no tool changes that ordering.

You want every word under your control. Nothing you send is drafted by anything but you, and for some founders that is non-negotiable.

When SendVC makes more sense

The research is the bottleneck, not the writing. Founders routinely spend the opening weeks of a raise building a spreadsheet instead of talking to investors, and that time is not recoverable.

You need reach beyond your network. Cold outreach is strictly worse than a warm intro, but it is strictly better than not reaching anyone — and most first-time founders do not have the network yet.

Contact data goes stale faster than you can maintain it. Partners move firms, funds change thesis, and a list assembled three months ago is already decaying.

You want the personalization without the hours. Writing a genuinely specific email per investor is what works and is exactly what does not scale by hand past a few dozen.